Important to note also that the first line shows in which file and at what segment the error is (the number after the file name in parenthesis is the corresponding segment number). See how XBench picked up the word “keyterm” (which doesn’t exists actually, yes □ ) as a Key Term? XBench has spotted that keyterm should be translated sa “mot-clé” but it can’t find it in the target segment as it was replaced by “mot-clef”. – Key Term Mismatch: because we have selected the “Key Terms” feature XBench picks up keywords and make sure the translation is consistent across the document. – Numeric Mismatch: numbers in source and target do not match. – Inconsistency in Source: different source segments have been translated the same. – Inconsistency in Target: same source segment has been translated differently. – Untranslated Segment: obviously the segment has no translation, i.e. One neat feature is that by clicking and selecting an error segment XBench actually highlights what could be wrong there. In this example the errors are of 5 types: The errors are listed by Error Description with the source and target segments next to it so that you can check what is the actual issue. The result is pretty much straight forward.Īs you can see XBench will list up all the errors it found in the file. Go to the QA tab, click on the “Check Ongoing Translation” button. In the next window, also click on the “OK” button. In the next window, make sure to check the box for “Key Terms” as it is used for keyterms consistency check. Open XBench then select “New” in the “Project Menu” (shortcut: ctrl + n)ĭrag and drop the sample file ( First_Steps_with_Xbench.doc_en-US_fr-FR.sdlxliff) in the “Project Properties” window (or select it from “Add…” button). (But as a professional translator it is highly recommended you do have Trados…) If you don’t have Trados, that is still okay you will not need it in this demo. You can download the sample file from here. We have prepared a sample file just for the sake of this demo. Here is the download page.ĭownload this sample. You can either go for the XBench 3.0 30 days trial or start with the free (yes free!) XBench 2.9. So, if you want to compare your machine to reviews online you may want to keep your older xbench version around since this one doesn't gain you much.ApSIC Xbench is a powerful Quality Assurance and Terminology Management tool.įollow this quick tutorial and get a feel of it.įirst thing first, go to the XBench website to download and install the software on your computer. For applications like this several runs should be done to get a good 'mark'. The text drawing (quartz) bug is still present if you run it a couple of times the characters are mapped and the test result is about 4x larger than a first time run. Note: Although there weren't any/many intel specific optimizations performed, the intel part was compiled w/ gcc 4 while the ppc w/ 3.3? Sounds like it should be fair. The step forward is just that we can get a test result from an intel based mac. So, I think a markdown for the benchmark is required. Do you round each task up, round down, leave it alone? A lot of the old reviews can't get the hardware to do this sort of test again. For third party sites that did reviews based on the previous baseline set it becomes a task. This is find for the Xbench site (simple recalculation) and for the application except smaller numbers mean slightly lower levels of precision. Now everything must be recalculated and adjusted. Most of the benchmarks on current machines that exist on the web and many older ones use the older standard. While I am glad that more developers are releasing UB applications, I think this may represent a 1 step to the side two steps back approach for Xbench, merely because of the change in the baseline machine.Ī Baseline was established and existed for months prior to this. The current version is released as a universal binary and is only 52k larger than its 644k predecessor. Xbench is a highly popular 'benchmarking' suite for Mac OS X.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |